.jpg)
The Libyan ex-agent Abdel Basser al Megrahi, convicted because of the death of 270 persons after the plain explosion in the city of Lockerbie in 1988, will be free soon after the authorities have decided it because he has a prostate cancer in terminal phase.
But the Ministry of Justice is in deliberation phase, and their decision could come this month. The protests of the victim relatives haven’t took a long time to come.
What I wonder is that if this man, that decided that he could choose when, where and how die more than 200 persons, deserves to die in liberty, where and how he decide. And the decision is in the hands of a man, that although he has studied a lot and he has a high-ranking position, he is no more than a man. I wonder if a person can really decide something so big.
But every day the persons, not only judges, decide things like that; an assassin decides the death of a person, but this is not allowed. And however it’s allowed that a judge decides if someone must be shut away all his/her life, and in some countries, if someone must die.
Is difficult to know if is fair that someone have so power in his/her hands, or if someone can study for decide the life of other people. We have decided to create rules, governments, posts with more or less importance. But is the life and the death something that a person can decide?
Release all persons that commit crimes it is not good, but can someone decide about the life of persons that are neither better nor worse, although they have done something bad?
Each one has his/her opinion about that. I know is necessary that some persons have more power that others, at least in the society that we have created, but is strange that for study more or have more money some persons have power above other completely equal to them.
Credits.
myself & abc.es
But the Ministry of Justice is in deliberation phase, and their decision could come this month. The protests of the victim relatives haven’t took a long time to come.
What I wonder is that if this man, that decided that he could choose when, where and how die more than 200 persons, deserves to die in liberty, where and how he decide. And the decision is in the hands of a man, that although he has studied a lot and he has a high-ranking position, he is no more than a man. I wonder if a person can really decide something so big.
But every day the persons, not only judges, decide things like that; an assassin decides the death of a person, but this is not allowed. And however it’s allowed that a judge decides if someone must be shut away all his/her life, and in some countries, if someone must die.
Is difficult to know if is fair that someone have so power in his/her hands, or if someone can study for decide the life of other people. We have decided to create rules, governments, posts with more or less importance. But is the life and the death something that a person can decide?
Release all persons that commit crimes it is not good, but can someone decide about the life of persons that are neither better nor worse, although they have done something bad?
Each one has his/her opinion about that. I know is necessary that some persons have more power that others, at least in the society that we have created, but is strange that for study more or have more money some persons have power above other completely equal to them.
Credits.
myself & abc.es
0 comments:
Post a Comment